The global burden of traumatic amputation in 204 countries and territories.

Background: Traumatic amputation leads to disability and imposes a heavy health burden. This study aims to explore the current status and temporal trends of the global burden of traumatic amputation according to sex, age, amputation site, cause, and reginal level of social development. Methods: The data were extracted from the Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) Study 2019. Prevalence, incidence, years lived with disability (YLDs) and corresponding age-standardized rate were compared. Estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) was applied to reflect trends in age-standardized rates over a specific period. Spearman rank test and curve fitting methods were used to analyze the relationship between disease burden and Socio-Demographic Index (SDI). Results: Globally, the incidence and prevalence number of traumatic amputation increased from 11.37 million and 370.25 million in 1990, to 13.23 million and 552.45 million in 2019, with a raise of 16.4 and 49.2%, respectively. But the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) (EAPC = -0.56; 95%CI, -0.72 to -0.41) and age-standardize prevalence rate (ASPR) (EAPC = -0.63; 95%CI, -0.74 to -0.52) declined during this period. The YLDs count also increased by 39.2% globally (from 5.28 million to 7.35 million), while the age-standardize YLDs rate (ASYR) decreased by an average of 1.00% per year (95% CI, -1.10 to -0.90) from 1990 to 2019. The incidence, prevalence, and YLDs rate of traumatic amputation continue to increase with age. Traumatic amputations were most common in the fingers, while unilateral lower limb amputation caused the greatest burden of disability. ASIR and SDI were positively correlated (ρ = 0.442, p < 0.001), while ASYR and SDI were not significantly correlated (ρ = -0.030, p = 0.669), and EAPC in ASYR and SDI were negatively correlated (ρ = -0.275, p < 0.001). Exposure to mechanical forces and falls were the leading causes of traumatic amputation. Conclusion: Despite the declining trends in ASIR, ASPR, and ASYR, the incidence, prevalence, and YLDs counts of traumatic amputation have increased significantly worldwide, especially in the older adults population. With the population aging, targeted health policies are needed to address the increasing global burden of traumatic amputations in the future.

Heterotopic Ossification Formation in Military Beneficiaries Following Hip- and Pelvic-Level Amputations.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic hip and pelvic level amputations are uncommon but devastating injuries and associated with numerous complications that can significantly affect quality of life for these patients. While heterotopic ossification (HO) formation has been reported at rates of up to 90% following traumatic, combat-related amputations, previous studies included few patients with more proximal hip and pelvic level amputations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the Military Health System medical record and identified patients with both traumatic and disease-related hip- and pelvic-level amputations performed between 2001 and 2017. We reviewed the most recent pelvis radiograph at least 3 months following amputation to determine bony resection level and the association between HO formation and reason for amputation (trauma versus disease related). RESULTS: Of 93 patients with post-amputation pelvis radiographs available, 66% (n = 61) had hip-level amputations and 34% (n = 32) had a hemipelvectomy. The median duration from the initial injury or surgery to the most recent radiograph was 393 days (interquartile range, 73-1,094). HO occurred in 75% of patients. Amputation secondary to trauma was a significant predictor of HO formation (χ2 = 24.58; P < .0001); however, there was no apparent relationship between the severity of HO and traumatic versus non-traumatic etiology (χ2 = 2.92; P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: Amputations at the hip were more common than pelvic-level amputations in this study population, and three-fourths of hip- and pelvic-level amputation patients had radiographic evidence of HO. The rate of HO formation following blast injuries and other trauma was significantly higher compared with patients with non-traumatic amputations.

Traumatic Amputations Treated in US Emergency Departments: A Review of the NEISS Database.

BACKGROUND: Trauma is the second most common cause of limb loss in the United States (US), second only to vascular disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographics and commercial products associated with traumatic amputations in the United States. METHODS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database was analyzed from 2012 to 2021 to identify patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with the diagnosis of amputation. Additional variables included patient demographics, body part amputated, commercial products associated with amputation, and ED treatment disposition. RESULTS: A total of 7323 patients diagnosed with amputation were identified in the NEISS database. Amputations were most frequent in the 0-5 years age group, followed by 51-55 years. More males than females suffered an amputation during the study period (77% vs 22%). Most patients were Caucasian. Fingers were most frequently amputated (91%), followed by toes (5%). Most injuries occurred in the home (56%). The top commercial product behind these traumatic amputations was doors (18%), followed by bench or table saws (14%) and power lawn mowers (6%). Over 70% of patients were able to be treated and released from the ED, while 22% required hospitalization and 5% were transferred to another facility. DISCUSSION: Traumatic amputations can cause significant injuries. A better understanding of the incidence and mechanisms behind traumatic amputations may help with injury prevention. Pediatric patients had a high incidence of traumatic amputations, which warrants further research and dedication to injury prevention in this vulnerable group.

Development of overuse musculoskeletal conditions after combat-related upper limb amputation: a retrospective cohort study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study INTRODUCTION: Service members who have sustained traumatic amputations are typically young and otherwise healthy. Beyond standard care, these individuals desire long, highly active, and relatively pain-free lifestyle, whether that is returning to active duty or transitioning to civilian life. Development of overuse musculoskeletal conditions could have a significant influence on quality of life for Service members with traumatic upper limb amputation. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Compare one-year incidence of overuse musculoskeletal injuries in Service members with different levels of combat-related upper limb amputation to Service members with minor combat-related upper limb injuries. METHODS: Service members with deployment-related upper limb injury (N = 519), 148 major upper limb amputation (55 with amputation at or above elbow, 93 with amputation below elbow) and 371 minor upper limb injury were included in the study. Outcomes of interest clinical diagnosis codes associated with overuse conditions of the upper limb, neck and upper back, lower limb, low back pain, and all regions combined, one year before and one year after injury. RESULTS: Overall, the one-year incidence of developing at least one musculoskeletal overuse condition after upper limb amputation was between 60% and 65%. Service members with upper limb amputations were 2.7 to 4.7 times more likely to develop an overuse upper limb condition, 3.6 to 3.8 times more likely to develop a neck and upper back condition, 2.8 to 4.4 times more likely to develop a lower limb condition, and 3.3 to 3.9 times more likely to develop low back pain as compared those who sustained minor combat-related injuries. No significant differences in the odds of developing a musculoskeletal condition was found between the above elbow and below elbow amputation groups. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of secondary overuse conditions is elevated in Service members with upper limb amputation and warrants focused research efforts toward preventative and rehabilitative interventions.

Can a Blade-Stopping Mechanism on Circular Table Saws Reduce the Severity of Hand Injuries in Contact Scenarios? A Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: Table saws are commonly used woodworking tools that carry a substantial risk of injury. Blade-stopping technology has been developed and has the potential to reduce the frequency and severity of injury. This study aimed to evaluate this technology on human tissue and characterize the resulting injuries. METHODS: Twenty-seven fresh, frozen cadaveric specimen hands were used. Three scenarios were tested, with the specimen (1) moving forward ("forward"); (2) moving backward, such as in a kickback scenario ("reverse"); and (3) dropped from above the saw blade ("top"). Each scenario was tested at both slow (0.001 m/sec) and fast (forward: 0.6 m/sec; reverse: 0.5 m/sec; top: 2.4 m/sec) approach speeds. The severity of the injuries was characterized by anatomic evaluation and confirmed with radiographic evaluation. Injuries were classified as no laceration, superficial soft tissue injury, deep soft tissue injury, and bony injury. RESULTS: For the slow approach speed, the brake cartridge engaged in 100% of the trials for all 3 scenarios, and 100% of the specimens sustained no injuries. Forward testing at a fast approach speed revealed the brake cartridge engaged in 89% of the trials (injuries: 4 superficial, 2 deep, 3 bony). Reverse testing at a fast approach speed revealed the brake cartridge engaged in 11% of trials (injuries: 1 superficial, 8 bony). Top testing at a fast approach speed revealed the brake cartridge engaged in 89% of the trials (injuries: 9 bony). CONCLUSIONS: Modern blade-stopping technology did not prevent all traumatic hand injuries in fast approach speed scenarios, but it reduced the incidence and severity of injuries. The technology was more effective at low approach speed scenarios. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study provide information to help understand the factors that can prevent or reduce the severity of contact injuries (hand, finger, or thumb) for operators of table saws.

The burden of post-traumatic amputations in a developing country - An epidemiological study from a level I trauma centre.

BACKGROUND: With the rapidly growing population and expanding vehicle density on the roads, there has been an upsurge in road accidents in developing countries. Knowledge about the causes and patterns of trauma-related amputations helps in the formulation of strategies for limb savage, timely management, and effective rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To study the epidemiology, demographic profile, and outcomes of post-trauma amputations at a level I tertiary care centre in North India. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of the amputee data from 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2019, focusing on demographic details, injury mechanisms, surgical delays, hospital stay, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 17,445 trauma cases were seen in our trauma centre during the study period. Of these, 442 patients (2.5%) underwent major limb amputation. The hospital-based prevalence of traumatic limb amputation was 2.5%. The mean age of the amputees was 35.6years (range 1-75), and the majority were males (n = 369, 83.5%). The lower to upper limb involvement ratio was 3:1 (n = 338:105). A road traffic accident was the most common mode of injury (77.4%), followed by machine-cut injuries (16.1%). On-site traumatic amputation was seen in 23.1% (n = 102), while 43.5% had a mangled limb amputated in the hospital (mean MESS score 9.53). Overall, 27% of cases had a vascular injury after trauma, ultimately ending in limb amputation. The in-hospital mortality was 2% (n = 9/442). 43.7% of patients with a single limb amputation were discharged within 48 h. Extended hospital stay was noted in cases with associated fractures in the other limbs (28.5%), head or facial injury (9.9%), and with or without a combination of chest, abdomen, pelvic, or spine injury (7.2%). CONCLUSION: A 2.5% incidence of post-trauma amputation reflects on the severity of injury related to road and industrial accidents which predominantly affect the lower limbs at the peak of productive work life. In the absence of national amputation registries, the results underscore the need to focus on road safety protocols, patient transfer methods, and the up-gradation of local hospitals.

Fingertip injury epidemiology: an Indian perspective.

Fingertip injuries result in significant morbidity. It is associated with pain, loss of work and recreational hours, financial burden, and distortion of body image. Although it is a common injury, the epidemiology of fingertip injury is a subject with scanty literature. This study is aimed at providing epidemiology of fingertip injury in India. Epidemiological data were collected and analysed through a retrospective review of all fingertip injuries over a period of four years treated in our department. In the paediatric population, among the 241 injuries in 221children, most occurred at home (98%). Most incidents were in children under five years of age (74%). The most commonly involved digit is the middle finger (29%) and door crush was the commonest reason (80%). Incomplete fingertip amputation with nail bed injury was seen in 80% of cases. In adults, there were 351 injuries in 290 patients, most of which occurred by jamming of the finger at a two-wheeler chain (22.5%). The second most common cause is cut by machine and associated with heavy machinery (17.6%). Complete amputation at the nailbed level was seen in 50% of the cases. Both children and adults need to be educated regarding the causation and effects of fingertip injuries. Damage to fingers can be prevented and reduced by observing safety measures both inside the home and at the workplace.

Epidemiology and Outcome of Nailbed Injuries Managed in Children's Emergency Department: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Fingertip injuries are among the most common hand injuries in children and result in significant health, time, and a financial burden. Nailbed injuries constitute a large proportion of fingertip injuries and are frequent in children. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the epidemiology, injury patterns, and treatment strategies implemented in patients with nailbed injuries between 0 and 18 years of age. We also wanted to identify various acute and chronic complications associated with nailbed injuries in these patients. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study carried out on the data collected between October 1, 2009, and October 31, 2019. RESULTS: We identified 457 patients with upper extremity nailbed injuries during the study period. Most children were male, accounting for 62.8% (287) of the patients. Door crush injuries (59.5%) resulted in the majority of the nailbed injuries. The commonest place of injury occurrence was home (46.4%), followed by playground (28.4%). The next most frequent areas were public areas (17.5%) and school (7.7%). Simple nailbed laceration with partial avulsion of the nail (44.4%) was the most common type of nailbed injury. Most nailbed injury repairs were done by the pediatric emergency doctor (72.2%). The predictors for the occurrence of complications after nailbed injury were the type of injury (stellate laceration and severe crushed nailbed injuries) and fracture of the distal phalanx. The predictors for the use of antibiotics after nailbed injury in our patients were the mechanism of injury (crushed in door, sports injury, and road traffic accident) and fracture of the distal phalanx. Age was found to be associated with subungual hematomas and avulsion, whereas female sex was found to be associated with crush injuries. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, most patients (72.2%) had their nailbed injuries repaired by pediatric emergency doctors. The commonest mechanism of nailbed injury was door crush injuries. Increased awareness and education of the caregivers might help avoid these injuries because the injury mechanism in most of the patients is preventable. Partial nail avulsion with underlying simple laceration of the nailbed was the most frequent type of nailbed injury seen. The complications that were seen after nailbed injuries were fingertip sensitivity (5.3%), split nail deformity (5.3%), infection (3.9%), nonadherence of the nail plate (2%), and hook nail deformity (1%). The predictors for the occurrence of complications after nailbed injury were the type of injury (stellate laceration and severe crushed nailbed injuries) and fracture of the distal phalanx. The predictors for the use of antibiotics after nailbed injury in our patients were the mechanism of injury (crushed in door, sports injury, and road traffic accident) and fracture of the distal phalanx. Age was found to be associated with subungual hematomas and avulsion, whereas female sex was found to be associated with crush injuries. Possessing a robust understanding of the mechanism of injury and the underlying anatomy with a detailed assessment of the nailbed injury is of paramount importance in the management of these patients. An initial thorough assessment and meticulous repair of the nailbed injuries will result in good outcomes with overall few complications.

Investigation of effective factors on traumatic amputations due to road traffic accidents.

AIM: To determine factors associated with the locations, types and levels of traumatic limb amputations caused by road traffic accidents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The files sent by the courts to the expert committee chaired by the authors for the determination of applicants' disability rate over the 10-year period between 2011 and 2020 were examined retrospectively. RESULTS: Of the 27 cases with traumatic amputations caused by road traffic accidents, 63% of them were male and the mean age of the cases was 29.0 ± 20.0 years. The cases comprised 12 passengers, 10 pedestrians, and 5 drivers. Of all, 66.7% of the amputations were caused by automobile accidents, 59.3% of them were in lower limbs, 51.9% of them were on the right side, and most of them occurred below the elbow/knee levels. Amputations occurred more frequently in lower limbs that are contralateral to the side of the traffic flow, in drivers, and in front seat passengers. CONCLUSION: The findings in this preliminary study need to be confirmed in studies to be conducted in larger series. The findings of these studies will shed light on technological developments that can be used in the prevention of serious injuries that lead to post-accident traumatic amputations.

The Roles of Injury Type, Injury Level and Amputation Type in the Need for Revision Surgery after Replantation: Retrospective Clinical Outcome with 296 Finger Replantation.

BACKGROUND: With the development of microsurgical techniques, the replantation survival rate has increased, but in some cases, revision surgery is required. Although there are many studies on replantation survival rate, studies on revision surgery are limited. In this study, we evaluated replantation patients requiring revision surgery in terms of amputation level, injury type, and amputation type (single-multiple). METHODS: This is a retrospective study.Two hundred fifty-six patients (296 fingers) who were operated on for total finger amputation in our hospital between 2013 and 2018 were included in the study. In the postoperative period, revision surgery was required for 24 fingers due to vascular insufficiency. Patients were evaluated in terms of amputation level, injury type, and amputation type. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-four fingers were saved after primary surgery. Eight fingers failed before they could undergo revision surgery. Revision surgery was performed for 24 fingers. After revision surgery, 19 fingers were saved, and five fingers were failed. There was no significant effect of gender and age in terms of revision (p > 0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in injury level and injury type, but there was a statistically significant difference in terms of amputation type (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite advanced microsurgery and experience, vascular insufficiency can be observed after replantation. Surgical re-exploration is necessary for salvage.

Retrospective observational study of characteristics of persons with amputations accessing International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) rehabilitation centres in five conflict and postconflict countries.

OBJECTIVES: Limb amputation incidence is particularly high in fragile contexts due to conflict, accidents and poorly managed diabetes. The study aim was to analyse (1) demographic and amputation characteristics of persons with any type of acquired amputation (PwA) and (2) time between amputation and first access to rehabilitation in five conflict and postconflict countries. DESIGN: A retrospective, observational study analysing differences in demographic and clinical factors and time to access rehabilitation between users with traumatic and non-traumatic amputations. SETTING: Five countries with the highest numbers of PwA in the global International Committee of the Red Cross database (Afghanistan, Cambodia, Iraq, Myanmar, Sudan). Cleaned and merged data from 2009 to 2018 were aggregated by sex; age at amputation and registration; cause, combination and anatomical level of amputation(s); living environment. PARTICIPANTS: All PwA newly attending rehabilitation. RESULTS: Data for 28 446 individuals were included (4329 (15.2%) female). Most were traumatic amputations (73.4%, 208 90); of these, 48.6% (138 01) were conflict related. Average age at traumatic amputation for men and women was 26.9 and 24.1 years, respectively; for non-traumatic amputation it was 49.1 years and 45.9 years, respectively. Sex differences in age were statistically significant for traumatic and non-traumatic causes (p<0.001, p=0.003). Delay between amputation and rehabilitation was on average 8.2 years for those with traumatic amputation, significantly higher than an average 3 years for those with non-traumatic amputation (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Young age for traumatic and non-traumatic amputations indicates the devastating impact of war and fragile health systems on a society. Long delays between amputation and rehabilitation reveal the mismatch of needs and resources. For rehabilitation service providers in fragile settings, it is an enormous task to manage the diversity of PwA of various causes, age, sex and additional conditions. Improved collaboration between primary healthcare, surgical and rehabilitation services, a prioritisation of rehabilitation and increased resource provision are recommended to ensure adequate access to comprehensive rehabilitation care for PwA.

Upper and lower limb amputations in vehicle-related fatalities.

Traumatic limb amputation is rare in occupants following a motor vehicle collision (MVC). A retrospective analysis of autopsy reports at Forensic Science South Australia (FSSA) over a 19 year period from January 2000 to December 2018 was performed to determine the incidence of limb amputation in lethal collisions and to identify predisposing factors. Only 18 cases (1.54%) of occupant fatalities had a traumatic limb amputation with an age range of 18-78 years (mean 44.2 years), male to female ratio 13:5, and an average body mass index (BMI) of 28.5 (overweight). There were nine cases of upper limb amputation and nine cases of lower limb amputation (one case had both upper and lower limb amputations). Head on impacts without subsequent rollover were the most common collision type in both upper and lower amputation. The likely cause of limb amputation in vehicle crashes is, therefore, speed on impact rather than rollovers as has been previously suggested.

Epidemiology of Upper-Extremity Amputations Using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System.

BACKGROUND: Upper-extremity amputations can be devastating injuries that lead to lifelong disabilities. The purpose of our study was to review national data and identify populations at risk and injury patterns that could be targeted with prevention strategies. METHODS: Data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System between years 2012 and 2018 were reviewed. Injuries affecting the upper extremity resulting in amputation were included. Patient demographics, anatomical location, mechanism of injury, level of care provided, and setting of injury were recorded. Descriptive was recorded and tabulated for each category. RESULTS: There were 4,766 patients identified with amputations to the upper extremity from 2012 to 2018. The following categories are listed below: age in years, sex, race, anatomical location of injury, most common mechanisms of injury, disposition of patient, environmental location. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that male children younger than 10 years are at the high risk for finger amputations. In addition, the majority of these injuries occur in the home. This suggests that safety prevention in the home is a significant area in need of improvement. We recommend further research in areas of home safety and injury prevention to decrease the risk of the devastating injuries.

Three-year (2017-2019) activity report of the Replantation Service for hand amputations in Poland.

This article summarises activity of the Replantation Service for hand amputations in Poland in years 2017-2019. Over this period a total of 551 cases of total and subtotal amputations as well as other complex injuries to the hand were referred to the referenced centres. Of these, 330 referrals were accepted and 221 rejected, for various reasons. Among these accepted, there were 165 total (50%) and 131 subtotal (40%) amputations; 34 patients (10%) had other severe hand injuries. Vast majority of the patients constituted young and middle-age males. The most common was amputation of several digits and thumbs - a total of 251 cases (76%), followed by transmetacarpal - 30 (9%), forearm - 23 (7%) and wrist - 20 (6%) amputations. Replantation of amputated extremity was performed in 138 patients (42%), revascularization in 98 (30%) and in 45 (14%) primary repair of the complex injuries. In 26 cases (8%), coverage of tissue defects was performed, and in 23 (7%) primary terminalization. Survival rate was of a mean of 65% for replantations and 85% for revascularizations. Comparing to the previously reported period 2013-2017, the number of treated patients was similar, but structure of injuries differed: number of digital amputations increased (of 22 cases), whereas number of proximal amputations (hand, forearm and arm) significantly dropped (of 50 cases). The importance of Replantation Service, an informal structure, in saving limbs of severely mutilated patients was emphasised.

Seasonal Trends in Traumatic Digit Amputations: Experience of a Level І and a Level ІІ Hospital in a Northeastern State.

Background: Traumatic digit amputations are common hand injuries in the United States. The primary aim of our study was to describe the relationship between season and mechanisms of amputation. Methods: The Emergency Department and Orthopaedic Surgery Billing Department databases of our level І institution in the Northeast were reviewed to identify patients with a traumatic digit amputation between January 2010 and December 2015. Inclusion criteria were defined as any patient presenting with a partial or complete amputation through Verdan zone I or II. All patient information was entered into a secure database, including date of injury, demographic information, digits amputated, mechanism of injury (crush, laceration, avulsion, bite, blast, saw, snow blower, or lawn mower), and Verdan zones of amputation. In addition to descriptive statistics, Fisher exact and χ2 tests were used to compare the incidence of these traumatic digit amputation mechanisms between seasons. Results: For this 6-year period, an average of 24 patients presented each season for treatment of a traumatic digit amputation. Of all seasons, spring had the highest proportion of lawn mower amputations (62.5%; P < .0001), summer had the highest proportion of blast amputations (75.0%; P = .011), and winter had the highest proportion of snow blower amputations (90.9%; P < .0001). All other traumatic digit amputation mechanisms had no significant seasonal variation in incidence (P > .30). Conclusions: Given that certain traumatic digit amputation mechanisms occur predictably during certain seasons, seasonal public education has the potential to prevent these debilitating injuries.

The trend of treatment and conveyance system for upper extremity replantation in Japan: A nationwide population-based study from the Japan trauma data bank.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, microsurgical skill development and a system to transfer patients to an appropriate hospital for upper extremity amputation have been promoted; however, information about trends of replantation is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify the trends in the treatment for upper extremity amputation using the Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB). METHODS: Data derived from JTDB (2004-2015) were used to quantify trends in the volume of replantation for upper extremity amputation including finger amputation. Trauma was diagnosed based on the Abbreviated Injury Scale code; a subgroup of patients who underwent replantation was delineated. We investigated patient demographics, infection rate, and characteristics of treating facilities. RESULTS: A total of 1240 patients underwent upper extremity amputation. Among these, 510 (41.1%) underwent replantation, and the rate of replantation did not change over the study period. The average age of patients who underwent or did not undergo replantation was 45.5 and 47.2 years, respectively. The proportion of the patients who were transferred to another hospital for treatment significantly decreased between 2004 (28.5%) and 2015 (16.3%) (P < 0.01). Time taken for transfer from the accident site to hospitals increased. The rate of patients who underwent replantation differed among different hospitals; however, higher-volume hospitals were more likely to perform replantation. CONCLUSION: The rate of patients transferred to another hospital decreased between 2004 and 2015; however, the rate of patients who underwent replantation remained unchanged. This suggests that the number of patients who were transported directly from the accident site to an appropriate hospital has increased, whereas the indication for care in each hospital remains unchanged. Common criteria for amputations are needed to address the differing rates of replantation among hospitals.

Global prevalence of traumatic non-fatal limb amputation.

BACKGROUND: Reliable information on both global need for prosthetic services and the current prosthetist workforce is limited. Global burden of disease estimates can provide valuable insight into amputation prevalence due to traumatic causes and global prosthetists needed to treat traumatic amputations. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to quantify and interpret patterns in global distribution and prevalence of traumatic limb amputation by cause, region, and age within the context of prosthetic rehabilitation, prosthetist need, and prosthetist education. STUDY DESIGN: A secondary database descriptive study. METHODS: Amputation prevalence and prevalence rate per 100,000 due to trauma were estimated using the 2017 global burden of disease results. Global burden of disease estimation utilizes a Bayesian metaregression and best available data to estimate the prevalence of diseases and injuries, such as amputation. RESULTS: In 2017, 57.7 million people were living with limb amputation due to traumatic causes worldwide. Leading traumatic causes of limb amputation were falls (36.2%), road injuries (15.7%), other transportation injuries (11.2%), and mechanical forces (10.4%). The highest number of prevalent traumatic amputations was in East Asia and South Asia followed by Western Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East, high-income North America and Eastern Europe. Based on these prevalence estimates, approximately 75,850 prosthetists are needed globally to treat people with traumatic amputations. CONCLUSION: Amputation prevalence estimates and patterns can inform prosthetic service provision, education and planning.

Traumatic upper-limb amputation: The process toward acceptance.

INTRODUCTION: After traumatic upper-limb amputation (TULA), one-third of patients develop traumatic pathological grief (PG). However, are the other two-thirds unscathed? The main aim of the present study was to assess the rate of TULA victims claiming to have dealt with the consequences and showing no PG. The secondary objective was to determine positive and negative factors enabling and preventing coping. METHOD: A retrospective clinical study was conducted over an 11-year period in all adult TULA cases in our department. Assessment was on questionnaire. PG was assessed on the ICG (Inventory of Complicated Grief). Factors were assessed on physical, psychological, social, functional, esthetic and epidemiological criteria. Statistical analysis used StatView software, with the significance threshold set at p<0.05. RESULTS: Functional and social impacts were significantly greater in case of PG. Thumb amputation was significantly associated with PG, while PG was significantly less frequent in case of amputation at the metacarpal base. Patients in PG had significantly more often undergone neuroma resection or stump revision surgery. DISCUSSION: Fewer than a half of TULA victims achieved cure. Long-term prognosis depends on the patient's ability to accept the new situation, much more than on amputation level. Patients need support from the very first minutes, with follow-up extended well belong scar healing. Onset and healing of the narcissistic wound are inevitably delayed compared to skin healing.

The impact of hospital, surgeon, and patient characteristics on digit replantation decision: A national population study.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic finger amputations cause a substantial burden to health care system. The purpose of this study is to investigate the epidemiology of traumatic finger amputations, the incidence of replantation attempts and to examine the patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics that were associated with replantation attempts. METHODS: We examined 49,469 patients with traumatic digit amputations from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan. We used Chi-square, ANOVA tests, and regression analysis to determine the important factors in decision to replant. RESULTS: The replantation rate increased significantly with increased hospital volume (low-volume: 4.7%, medium-volume: 19.1 % and high-volume: 35.9 %). Regional hospitals were more likely to attempt replantation (odds ratio = 1.35). Low-volume hospitals had a replantation failure rate of 11.1 %, medium-volume 19.7 % and high-volume hospitals had 13.8 %. CONCLUSION: With the national health insurance coverage, hospital volume is a substantial factor to encourage microsurgical-trained staff to perform digit replantation when indicated. The findings from this study will support government initiatives to foster and reward regionalization centers with high to medium case volume of replants to manage this critical function restoring procedure.

Trends in the Management of Traumatic Upper Extremity Amputations.

PURPOSE: Treatment for upper extremity amputations includes revision amputation or attempted replantation. The rate of digital replantation has been declining in the United States. Prior studies discovered the presence of socioeconomic disparities associated with these injuries. The goals of this study were to investigate yearly trends of traumatic upper extremity amputations and evaluate the presence of disparities with access to care in these injuries. METHODS: The 2008 to 2014 New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) inpatient and outpatient databases were utilized to identify patients who had traumatic upper extremity amputations. We queried the database for patient characteristics, resource utilization characteristics, insurance status, major in-hospital complications, and mortality. Patients at low-, medium-, and high-volume institutions were compared. We performed multivariable logistic regressions for the binary variable replantation (yes/no) controlling for age, sex, race, insurance status, amputation level, admission hour, and comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 2,492 patients met our inclusion criteria: 92.1% sustained digital amputations and 7.9% sustained arm amputations. The annual rate of inpatient finger amputations decreased significantly (1.9 per 100,000 people in 2008 vs 1.4 per 100,000 people in 2014) during the study period while that of outpatient finger amputations increased significantly (12.0 per 100,000 people in 2008 vs 15.5 per 100,000 people in 2014). Multivariable analysis demonstrated incrementally lower odds for replantation with increasing age and increased odds for replantation in patients with private insurance (odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.50). The number of replantation surgeries at medium-volume institutions decreased by 45% while remaining steady in low- and high-volume institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings corroborate the findings of other studies that underscore the existence of disparities with respect to insurance status in these injuries. Replantations occur more frequently at high-volume hospitals and are more common in younger patients with private insurance. This finding suggests that patients with traumatic amputations may benefit from treatment at high-volume institutions. Further research to help improve access to such institutions is warranted. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.